D6: Third-Party Uses
How Distinctive Connotations and Conceptual Weakness Can Overcome a Section 2(d) Refusal
GOOD TIMES // GOODE TIMES GUARANTEED
D6: Third-Party Uses
GOOD TIMES // GOODE TIMES GUARANTEED
D1: Similarity of Marks
DUNDER MIFFLIN // MIFFLIN
D2: Similarity of Goods or Services
CASA BLANCA // CASABLANA
2(d) Refusal Reversed
HOUSE OF PRIM // PRIM
D2: Similarity of Goods or Services
DAILY HARVEST CAFE // DAILY HARVEST
D4: Purchaser Sophistication
MERMAID // MERMADE
D2: Similarity of Goods or Services
PRO-GO // HANDY PRO-GO
D2: Similarity of Goods or Services
LA LA LAND // LA LA LAND
D1: Similarity of Marks
SEVEN STARLING // STARLING PHYSICIANS
If you practice solo or in a small firm, do you ever have moments when you wish your team were just a little bit bigger? Or you are not the one in charge? For me, those moments usually hit when I'm staring at a messy USPTO Office Action,
Specimen
During my Big Law days, I was doing mostly patent work, with a few trademark matters thrown into the mix. I remember spending days researching the DuPont factors, analyzing proposed mark against existing registrations, and drafting clearance opinions. All felt very academic and intellectual. I even worked on a trademark
Specimen
Receiving a failure-to-function refusal after filing a Statement of Use can feel like a punch in the gut. It’s especially frustrating when you’ve won hard-fought battles (both with the USPTO and your own client) just to get tripped up at the five-yard line. The